This site is meant to facilitate the upward flow of information to help our elected officials stay in touch with those they represent. Also as a means to help us (the voters) help our leaders lead.

Showing posts with label Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trump. Show all posts

Friday, February 3, 2017

Pastors Preaching Politics?



Free speech in Church?


One sunny morning a few years ago I was working in our newly formed neighborhood garden (Love Community Garden) in downtown Muskegon. As far as Muskegon goes this was the “hood”. 
Forgive my taking the liberty of putting up the following pics as I'm really proud of what we did.





The garden was at the base of a hill upon whose top sat a small clapboard church who’s minister graciously let my friend and I start a community garden in the low area. 

This picture below is not of the church, but is it's "spitting image" other than ours was a lot more run down.  This must be a model the Baptist's used around the country.  Even the sign out front is the same.



We had canvassed our neighbors and found lots of people willing to set up and take care of our 30 some little 4’x8’ raised beds. Each neighbor got one, we didn’t ask what Party they were in. We found suppliers and friends willing to do the work to build the plots and fill them with dirt and the rest was history. It is running to this day.

As I sat there that Sunday in 2008 while tending my own little plot, moving church music wafted down to me. I started listening and as the windows were open this warm summer day I could hear the sermon fairly clear. The minister was extolling the virtues of a Candidate whom could be the first “black President” and how his congregation needed to get out and vote – to do their civic duty and be part of this historic event.

I was reminded that day of the importance sermons from the pulpit had played in helping to form our nation. I had seen old movies of pastors and ministers preaching in favor of freeing ourselves from the yoke of British rule.  Then later about freeing our Society of Slavery.  Years later I took part in a daily re-enactment of the original Boston Tea Party at the Boston the Tea Party Museum. It was in a church and the minister was really a rable-rouser.

Back to the garden in 2008, as I listened to the minister in that little Baptist Church rouse his flock I also remembered that I had little luck in my efforts trying to get local churches of a “Conservative” bent to do anything at all to help with the starting of our Tea Party, and later even with “Right to Life” or anything else related to politics let alone give a sermon in direct support of a candidate.

They told me they were afraid of losing their tax exempt status. The Pastor above Love Community Garden didn’t feel so constrained.

As things turned full circle I read on 2/3/2017 that President Trump went to his first “Prayer Breakfast” in Washington – an annual “must do” for Presidents. While most of the news was all about the President saying he was going to pray for Arnold Schwarzenegger the new host for “the Apprentice” who’s rating have fallen: I could not help jumping on the following quote of Trump. “I will get rid of and totally destroy the Johnson Amendment and allow our representatives of faith to speak freely and without fear of retribution,”.

I see now others have noticed and talk of it is picking up steam. Here is an article from the federalist.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/02/03/trump-is-right-churches-should-be-free-to-express-themselves-politically/

Again to remind myself of the historical importance of the freedom of speech by our religious leaders I did some more digging and came up with somethings I had over looked.

I know of “Patriots Day” I had forgot it was named after the events which happened April 9th, 1775 in Lexington. I had also heard of the “Minutemen” and their “shots fired heard around the world” and through history. What I didn’t know was the specifics I found in the following article.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/has-america-forgotten-about-the-pastors-who-helped-win-our-independence/

One pastor Jonas Clark, was hiding two patriots in his home, Samuel Adams and John Hancock under guard of 12 of Clark’s men. During the confrontation on Lexington Green from which came the “shots heard around the world” another 65 or so of the Pastors congregation formed the Minutemen who stood up to 800 heavily armed British soldiers. Well the rest is history. Though the role religion played in it may have been downplayed.  The importance of Pastors never can.

Here is a quote from the following link.  " One of Clark’s house guests asked him on that night if the Lexington people would fight if necessary. Clark, who had laid a solid foundation concerning the duty of self-defense of inalienable rights for years through his sermons, responded confidently: “I have trained them for this very hour!”


So the shot I heard at Wednesday Prayer Breakfast when President Trump said the following was no surprise.  {…allow our representatives of faith to speak freely and without fear of retribution,”} By getting rid of the Johnson Amendment which threatens any 501C-3 tax exempt organization with the pulling of their exemption if endorsing a political Party or Candidate.


One thing to note all 501C-3s are affected by this Johnson Amendment of the tax code. That would include Universities, Tea Parties and all sorts of enterprises which are titled non-profit. We will have to wait and see if the secret executive order pertains to all 501C-3s or just the religious ones. The article bellows talks of the “executive order” on religious freedom.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-pledges-destroy-johnson-amendment-blocking-political/story?id=45221858

It seems from my experience in 2008 and later in life seeing the political left centered teachings in most universities, who they let come and speak etc. at their University, and the labor unions; the law does what the Framers knew laws did, especially lots of laws.

Selective enforcement of those laws soon becomes the norm and the government bodies trying to enforce those laws soon became politicized. Picking and choosing what laws to enforce and upon which groups.

I am of the general opinion that without the Johnson Amendment religious organizations can talk politics as they see fit. Some will talk one way and others will talk the other, some will be in the middle and some may decide to stick to the Scripture and leave it up the individual their political views. Either way the individual still has the right to go to whatever church they see fit - right left or middle or “no-church”.

We picked freedom back then, we should be able to exercise that freedom again.
Which is as it should be.




Regards, Bob Carr
Live Dangerously, Tell the Truth
glhotdogs513@gmail.com
231-728-3455

Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Newt and Laura's War?



Newt and Laura’s War?


Strange bedfellows?  Perhaps but think what each separately could do?


Gingrich calling Trump’s battle a “War”

http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/gingrich-trump-faces-war-establishment/?utm_content=buffer95922&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=laura_ingraham_buffer

I’ve blogged for years about the bureaucratic nightmare that is Washington. I remember in one of Newt’s books he finally answered the question of why he wasn’t able to accomplish more of the Contract with America than he did. He said when he was Speaker of the House he kept on some of the old dogs as heads of the Committees because he thought their wisdom would help. He said that was a mistake. 

He didn’t drain the swamp well enough and seems afraid Trump won’t either.


He realized too late that they were the problem and caused his plans for the type of change he envisioned and wants Trump to make to falter through delay, inaction, and just getting bogged down in amendments.

Newt knows from whence he speaks.

From the PoliZette article I pulled this quote. “Trump, Gingrich said, has a chance to upend an Establishment that has ruled for 84 years — dating back to the New Deal. He said the president-elect should not expect Democrats, the media, or the permanent bureaucracy to simply roll over.”

Well anyone with a TV will see that the Media isn’t or has plans to roll over any time soon.

Big job, some would say an impossible job. What do you think, is it doable, do you think he could use some help? Well people said the same about Trump beating 17 other Republicans and winning the nomination and the the election? – well forget about it right? He got a lot of help doing that from who? You? He won.

He proved himself to the voting public. They voted – Trump won.

He did it. To be precise, we helped him. How can we help him now? I don’t have the answers but I might have one. Put your own thinking cap on. Use the imagination God gave you, the freedom the Constitution gave you and get out of the house and deal with the reality nature gave you and find a solution.

Trump needs our help. If you think turning Washington on its head is a good thing, leave your biases and agenda at home and figure out for yourself, “What can I do today” to help make this happen.

On the national stage. On the state stage. On the local stage.

Outside of the cities, locally Republicans/Trumpians are doing ok. We have control of more state governments than in any time in our past. That can and will change if we don’t make ourselves heard. My counterparts on the left are working their hardest to make that change. 

Some bigger things are cyclical and against us if things remain unchanged.  I'm talking Demographics and minorities increasing etc.  But we have a superior message and if we can connect we can earn trust.  But that is a personal one on one thing.

You can be the "One" - you are needed to help out.  You simply need to start asking questions - figure out where to start. Find a candidate you like and simply ask, what can I do to help? I have barely enough money to eat but I can find things to help them out with. Knocking on doors, or walking in parades or just showing up at events they have. Some feel more comfortable in a Party setting, find yours.  Grab a phone book or google on line.  Ask questions. 

Believe me anything you can do is very much appreciated. Remember also that the main axiom in politics is that “Politics is Personal”. It works both ways.

Same for state politicians. They are still pretty accessible at this level.

On the National Stage, this last Trump election showed just how effective local people making local efforts were upon the election. When Obama first ran I saw firsthand the effect local effort had on that 2008 election on Obama’s side. I simply tried to duplicate it for Trump.

What to do now?

Think about the election coming in 2018. Think US Senate. I could not think of a better gift to give our new President than a larger more Trump centric US Senate majority. With only 8 Republicans vs 25 Democrats up for re-election this looks doable.

Here in Michigan where Debbie Stabenow seems unbeatable I think it necessary to find a decent candidate and mount a good grass roots fight to force the Dems to at least put more effort into defending her, thus giving us better chances in other Senate races to pick up a few seats. Heck it is not un-doable to think we may be able to have a veto-proof Senate for Trump in 2018. But I’d be happy to pick up 2-4 seats and I think 6 is possible. We would need 8 for a veto-proof Senate.

Remember too that the Dems are in a defensive frame of mind and because they lost Michigan in the Presidential race Stabenow who is rising in the ranks of Senate minority power (#3) will be able to demand more money from big donors and the DNC than she would otherwise.

Along those lines, what if Senator Joe Lieberman who is an Independent but caucuses with the Dems changes and starts to caucus with the Republicans? Just thinking.  Remember he introduced glowingly Trump's nominee for Education Secretary Michigan's own Betsy DeVos.

Just thinking positive, try it you’ll like it.

Here is what the Hill thinks about the 2018 Senate races.

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/306210-10-senate-seats-that-could-flip-in-2018

Here’s a thought.

Laura Ingraham



Laura Ingraham is thinking about running for US Senate. Her opponent would be none other than Tim Kaine the former Governor and sitting Senator of Virginia. Also he was the Democrat National Chair. Remember he was the Kaine in “Hillary/Kaine”.

Wow that guy is almost as unbeatable as ----- Hillary. LOL.

Here is the article in the Washington Examiner by Paul Beddard, 1/15/2017.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/talk-radios-laura-ingraham-eyes-senate-bid/article/2611913

To unseat a sitting Senator with national creds and a $1.6 million war chest already in a state most think isn’t up for grabs would be a daunting task.

But.

Laura Ingraham was always one of my favs since I started blogging, she was also a blogger she is a fighter above all she is not a politician with her own national creds. From the first time I saw her and read her blogs in that geeky unrelated to reality way, I felt we had something in common. I followed her whatever she was into. In 2015 she set up Lifezette.

https://www.lifezette.com/

Laura is Editor and owner of the site.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LifeZette

It seemed to be modeled along the Breitbart website. As Breitbart News was broken down into Big Government, Big Journalism, Big Hollywood etc. Ingraham’s site LifeZette is broken down into PoliZette, MomZette, HealthZette, FaithZette, and PopZette.

What I liked about her from the start was her tongue in cheek humor, her feistiness and that she was really smart. She was a Supreme Court Clerk for Clarence Thomas for starters, dummies and braggarts need not apply for that job.

There is hope I believe for her.

Hillary/Kaine won Virginia by 5.3%. Tim Kaine was the Governor of Virginia then ran and won the Senate seat in 2012 with nearly a 6% margin. Remember that was in an Obama election year, he was Governor and his opponent George Allen was relatively unknown outside the state. The big boy donors stayed away from Allen except the Koch brothers did put up $35 k. Like I said not much big money went into that race. The big question in my mind would center on Laura Ingraham’s ability to attract some of the big donors to be able to kick start her campaign. I think she is the only one with the ability to connect with the “Trump Deplorables” and at the same time bring along the highbrow Republicans.

Interesting question.

Why is Virginia a “deep South” state voting Democrat lately? Well it is becoming a suburb of Washington on the Potomac. Half the Bureaucracy lives in Virginia. Compare the election map with where Washington DC is.  The deepest Blue.




I do hope she thinks this through and decides to run. I’m thinking Donald Trump would be in favor of it. He did consider her at one point to be his press secretary. I’m hoping he holds rallies for candidates he likes. She would need his help.

Either way that would be a good race to put a great deal of effort into as the Dems are on the ropes and will be trying desperately to hold onto the seats they have. We need to make them pay dearly if they want to hold Virginia. If they don’t put all their effort into Virginia and Kaine stumbles or Laura with Trump pull a Trumpian type campaign they may find themselves facing another unsuspected Kaine election loss not unlike the Hillary/Kaine one they still can’t get over. 



Heck, I’d even help set up a crayon, playdoh fund for the poor losers.

One thing people are forgetting is how good Trump was with the whole campaign with the people thing. Think what he could do to help candidates in 2018 if he continues trying his damnedest to drain the swamp and the people see progress?

For this Senate upset to happen, Trump needs to prove to his voters that he is continually fighting in that war Newt talked about and doing all he can to win it. We proved what an informed and upset rural population can do when they rise up.

If Trump stays fighting in our corner we can do it again and better.

With good leadership at the top, and lots of help from the Bottom Up.

Find something to do and “Swoosh” just do it.



Regards, Bob Carr
Live Dangerously, Tell the Truth
glhotdogs513@gmail.com
231-728-3455

Monday, January 16, 2017

bullying

Bullying

I remember when bullying was something I would see occasionally on the playground growing up. It was usually done by bigger nastier (well you know bully types) to those who had no friends and were smaller weaker.


I know that if I saw one of my friends being picked on I would at least stand up for him. That usually worked. Back then the bullies were afraid of being found out for what they were, chickens. That was then of course, they/we didn’t have the luxury of the internet and anonymity.

The very worst thing the internet has given us is the false sense of security we get from seeing only what we want to see and being able with the tools of the internet to construct our own little reality. Any opinions contrary to that reality are mocked and made fun of (yes bullied) into submission. Facts in this scenario as with any bullying become irrelevant.

Might Makes Right. Back into the primordial ooze we go.

I think it fair to say that we are in the midst of a “Dark Age” of the internet where “Might again Makes Right”. This is also far away from the way our Founding Fathers pictured the interplay of rights and responsibilities they envisioned when forming the government of the United States of America.

They saw what effect the tyranny of the masses had upon the creativeness of the individual. They tried to protect that freedom from the beheadings they saw in France which had a more pure democratic system of the proletariat. 



Now the internet has given us total freedom with no accountability. Great right? Anarchists of all stripes both left and right have been fighting against those responsibilities entrusted to the people by the Constitution to insure their own rights. They have been fighting all the apparatuses set up that protects those responsibilities and makes our rights possible. No I didn’t write that backwards. By protecting and owning our responsibilities our rights become possible and are best protected.

Our civilization fought its way out of the primordial swamp in fits and starts. Two steps forward, two steps back. Every once and a while we would learn from our past and make 3 steps forward and only 2 back.

Struggle is key in this respect. Struggle allows us to focus on our #1 genetic coding sequence. Survival. Survival may seem base and crude to some but when asked, or when you ask yourself; why am I here? What is my purpose? Survival is about the best answer. In times of struggle we are at our best. Ironically, that is when we come up with some of our greatest leaps of faith. That is also when our worst side comes out too.

When we lack struggle those who reach the top impose their own struggle upon themselves. From Jesus’s fasting in the Desert, to you name it. The walk about all civilizations put on their kids to force them to grow up on their own. Training 24/7 by top sport figures when they have already achieved the highest awards. Personally, my beating myself up on line to force myself into action that I would normally say I have neither the time nor money to do.

It is from our own struggle and the struggle of others that we have learned the need to control to some extent that very thing that creates such greatness and beauty in our world - individual freedom.

Our zenith of civilization so far can be glimpsed in science, technology, industry, the arts and individual freedoms. Great things have been accomplished through setting up minimal apparatus to ensure individuals their freedom to struggle to achieve greatness.


A great surge forward came with the age of reason. The concept that I individually could reason and figure out my own problems with my own mind was a pretty liberating concept. Ironically the Church helped put this in place or at least went along with it. Later governments were formed to that.

The forces against freedom are of as many forms as those fighting for it. One thing to keep in mind is that they will always give lip service to the idea that they are fighting the restraints of individual freedom. But like my mama used to say, the proof is in the pudding. Look to what they propose in its stead to see the real color of their plans. Usually it is more and more constraints on our freedom in order they say to protect it.

The main apparatus we have set up to insure individual freedom can be found in a government based upon the rule of law based upon the idea that all people are created equally not physically but in their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The age of reason here is apparent in our right to defend ourselves in front of our peers. How many cases now actually make it to a trial of our peers?

The rule of law is the bedrock upon which Free Enterprise and its counterpart money rests. It insures a level jousting field upon which our efforts will be judged by the buying public. Minimal restraint upon that freedom are needed to be sure our ideas/products aren’t stolen or “Bullied away” from us by those more powerful. Or worse yet confiscated for the dreaded “Common Good”.

As I’ve stated we live by struggle, our struggle is to always fight for what will insure our individual freedom from those who want to live off of our creativeness and individual energies. When I saw the bullying going on in the media during the election of the Trump supporters I was outraged and found an outlet and means of struggle by supporting Trump supporters wherever I found them. I/we fought hard and we won.

I thought it was a done deal. Now there is talk of impeachment and Trump isn’t even our President yet. The media is going absolutely nuts. Protesters across the country are gearing up for massive disruptions of our election process and the peaceful transition of power. They threaten the very concepts that our nation is based upon. What are my responsibilities in this?


Am I just to blog away and do nothing? What am I to do? Am I here just to make fun of those who back down? (that was a Segway lol).

Jennifer Holliday and opera star Andrea Bocelli were bullied out of performing at Trump’s inaugural ball. They were taunted with death threats and boycotts of their works. They backed down to the bullies. Please note that these threats were made anonymously. Yet the fear they caused was real, more real for they know not who to stand up too in person.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/13/arts/music/jennifer-holliday-trump-inauguration-performance.html

About a week ago Jennifer in a NY Times article said this about her reasoning for not backing down. “Ms. Holliday said she had been startled and disheartened on Friday by the venom that greeted the news of her participation.” “It brought a lot of threats from people already saying I’ll never work again,” she said. “If that’s what America has come to, where we all hate and bully people, there’s no more freedom of speech.”

She added, “I know everybody hates me now, but that shows we are all just hateful people now — we don’t even want to work together.”

Less than 2 days later she backed out in total surrender to the LGTBT. For the full letter to the LGBT community see the first printing of it in the WRAP.

http://www.thewrap.com/jennifer-holliday-trump-inauguration-lgbt/

When the shoe is on the other foot they like to say freedom of speech. I remember in 2015 Bill Maher was protested in a speech he gave at UC Berkley. He was protested for saying something disparaging of the Muslim religion. He said it in humor about Muslim’s crying about freedom of speech when they cut off the heads of non-believers. Ironically shortly thereafter some Muslim’s did just that. At least Maher hasn’t backed down yet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pntZQN-rLw

From both of these examples we see that they believe in freedom of speech and are willing to stand up for it at least a little. Too bad they never seem to follow through. Take the ones who said they’d leave the country if Trump won.

Still waiting on that one to happen. When ya all leaving? Ruth Bader, Streisand, Miley Cyrus, Whoopi and Al Sharpton to name a few?

But I digress. What am I to do? I saw in the Oceana Herald Journal something about some women from Oceana County to attend the protest of the Trump Inauguration. I didn’t see any names other than someone to contact. Anonymity anyone. Neither did I see any article about people from Oceana going to celebrate Trump’s Presidency. I think it time I write some letters to the editor about some people going pro Trump or some of the celebrations here happening in the Pro Trump vein. I know of a small gathering already in Hesperia. Time to do some digging.

If you know of anything along this vein please let me know and I’ll try to do something with it.



Thanks and Regards,
Bob Carr,
Live Dangerously, Tell the Truth
glhotdogs513@gmail.com
231-728-3455

Monday, January 2, 2017

Out of the Bureaucratic Box or not?



Secretary of Agriculture



Back in August 2016 Trump put together a huge up to 70 person Agricultural Advisory Committee. That’s what he does that is how he operates. Gathers smart people around him and listens to what they say. The purpose was probably two fold. Get information and get votes. He got both from leaders he gathered.

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/trump-campaign-announces-agricultural-advisory-committee

With the Ag. Community he faces a problem he doesn’t face with other areas such as mining and natural resources. Regulations are the friend of Big Farms. Republicans have been shielding them with subsidies and price guarantees for a long time. The Ag. People are one of the few political bulwarks of Republican fundraising. Most Republicans will be hard pressed to strictly enforce the “Trump Doctrine” of less regulations and fewer hand outs.

I live in a rural community in Michigan. All around me I see farms. But according to the following USDA report rural communities which used to be farm based in the early 1900s are now only 20% farm based and the rest non-farm. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/eib3/13566_eib3_1_.pdf

From the document above. “U.S. population living on farms also declined (fig. 1), as did agriculture’s central role in the rural economy; while farming-dependent counties once comprised most of the rural economy, only 20 percent of nonmetro counties were considered farming-dependent in 2000 (fig. 2).”

Oceana County is rural and Republican since the old timers can remember. Our last election for the vast majority of the County/Township races was decided in the Republican Primary. Very few Democrats even bothered to put themselves on the ballot. Some I’m sure ran as Republicans. Most Democrats voted in the Republican Primary but that is another blog altogether.

I campaigned hard and spent a lot of the little money I had for Donald Trump. I traveled to and through 5 Counties around me delivering Trump/Pence signs. Actually selling them for $2 @. Not to make money but to break even. They cost me $1.75 @, I had bought 2,000 of them. Gas money and giving away a couple hundred took care of any profit – and then some. But selling them seemed like a Trumpian type of thing to do; but Donald I’m sure would have made a profit.

I and a bunch of fellow Trumpsters and Republicans had around 10 mini “flash mobs” on street corners of the different villages in Oceana County in which we waved signs and people honked their horns and gave us thumbs up. We did this every Friday morning up until the election. Never had I seen so many people excited to see us. I felt as if we were letting people know that it was ok to actually show support for Trump. We let them know they weren’t alone and I was surprised by the enthusiastic response we were getting. (Isn’t that really all Trump did?) I say this all not to brag (well maybe a little) but to say that I have some knowledge of where the unexpected Trump victory in Michigan came from.

When I say this I’m talking about the 80% of rural populations not working or owning farms but still living in rural communities, which the above USDA document showed.

Along those lines I also know some people in the organized Ag community – the 20%. I also know a lot of them were dead set against Trump and said so. Even after he won the primary. While most of them probably ended up voting for him they weren’t the ones that put him over the top – they would have voted for any Republican.

I say all this to point out a fallacy people in power have and that they find hard to get away from. It is the same fallacy that lost Hillary the election and why the likes of Jeb Bush and the rest the Primary Candidates lost the victory they paid so dearly for. They get so involved in their “group” or association that they lose contact with the rest of the world. Wasn’t it Jeb who said he would win the Primary without the base? How asinine was that?

From the Advisory Committee at the very top of the post you see the name Kipp Tom. Owner of the Biggest Ag business in Indiana. He was quoted as saying the following in an article in Politico:

“I think the bottom line is we need someone who has a proven track record and understands what needs to be done at USDA,” The “track record” he was talking about was within the USDA or it’s other related organizations.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/trumps-agriculture-secretary-search-farmers-232932

That statement highlights the fallacy. People in these organizations have blinders on. The USDA document also said the following about the number and size of farms in the last 100 years. “Since 1900, the number of farms has fallen by 63 percent, while the average farm size has risen 67 percent”. Also it showed how in the same period the farms originally depended on 5+ crops now they depend on a single crop. The USDA pointed out the government’s meddling being the culprit as to why the farmers who should know better began putting all their eggs into one basket. “…the effects of farm price and income policies that have reduced the risk of depending on returns from only one or a few crops.”



When faced with this, what was a person to do when those in power just wrung their hands, pulled their hair, told you it was a complicated issue which would take a while to fix, then shook your hand and said if you’ll vote for me I’ll work on it? Well in the past we did over and over and all they did was continue to pull out their hair at the complexity of it all and nothing got better – it got worse – it cost more – it cost us more.


Then along came Donald.



He didn’t pretend to be a farmer, didn’t pretend to be a CIA spy, and didn’t pretend to be anything other than what he was. A successful business man who knew how to get things done, by hiring the right people to give him the facts so he could make a better decision.

The dude was 70 and tireless, he reached out to people that had been discounted and who had fallen through the cracks. People who were belittled by the media and the elites, called names and he simply said, “I’m with you”. Hillary said "be with me" and when they failed to swoon for her she called them a basket of deplorables.

Simple but wow the people saw the difference and they trusted Trump. The rural world asserted itself at election time and it felt good. Real good. I’m friends with one politician who was the first out of the box for Trump of our state’s legislators and he was simply giddy after the Trump win. I’d never seen him happier.

Americans myself included are not used to having someone who knows how to succeed in business actually run government. However it was said with some justification that people who failed in business went into politics. This is going to be an interesting and unique time for our country.

While I appreciate the business end of forming committees of large numbers of influential people I just hope that President Elect Trump after shedding the “Elect” part of the title remembers the creed that allows “Free Enterprise” to flourish. That creed is Individual Freedom specifically freedom from regulation. He has shown by his selection of non Ag business appointees that he seems to have that hatred of regulation in his genes.

I hope he can translate that into the Ag. Community with whoever he appoints. About a year ago I read a book by Joel Salatin a guru of the chicken tractor and other organic liberal type of things. The book was titled “Why is everything I do Illegal?” He is a very small farmer who has had to fight regulations his whole existence as he is always looking and doing things out of the box. I don’t think he would be a good choice but he would certainly shake up the Ag Industry in it’s slow creep towards monopoly.  What I do know is that there are many small time liberals out there who don't like over regulation either.

The people honking horns and giving Trump thumbs up in Oceana were just everyday people, in fact one big shot in the Ag community gave me the thumbs down. He recently ran as a Republican.  From talking with him I felt he felt Trump didn’t know the problems he and other large farmers faced. Well I know that I and most of those honking voted for Trump BECAUSE he didn’t have a “proven track record so that he would better understand what needed to be done at USDA,” We wanted someone to shake up the status quo that was getting us nowhere, flush out the bad and create something better.

That is something I hope he does in farming as he seems to be doing in the rest of the government world.

I don’t know of anyone who could live up to that billing. But I sure would love to see it happen. He’s been surprising me and everyone else for so long, maybe it can be a kind of self-fulfilling type of thing? One thing I know is for this to happen we need to get over our over indulgence in self-demoralizing cynicism and give a hand when needed. When finally faced with the truth it is time to smile and say how can I help?

Man all I got to say is that it is taking a long time for Jan. 20th to get here.

Can you imagine the crowd, kind of our own Woodstock moment.

Regards, Bob Carr
Live Dangerously, Tell the Truth
glhotdogs513@gmail.com
231-728-3455

PS. For those who like researching further into the topic of thinking outside the bureaucracy, with the Trump picks for his Cabinet, try this?

Talk about shaking things up here is an article by a new found (for me) journalist Suzanne Fields titled “Shakin Up the Little Red Schoolhouse”. Well written and lots of original thought. She is an accomplished journalist but I never really read her before, I will start paying attention.

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/fields120916.php3

Suzanne too hopes the status quo gets shook up by Donald Trump and his appointee Betsy DeVoss for Secretary of Education. She too wouldn’t be big on listening to the Ed. Industry (NEA) which got us into the mess. She values new blood from people who might not have a proven track record in that area. People that might shake up the status quo.  A favorite quote from the article: "Reading skills underlie digital literacy -- which ought to be written in large letters on the wall in every classroom."

We should at least pick people that haven’t a proven track record of failure but those willing to actually fix what is broken.  Failure is not and need not be a requirement for government work.

Regards, Bob Carr
Live Dangerously, Tell the Truth
glhotdogs513@gmail.com

231-728-3455

COUNTER